Affirmative Action “victim” from the Gratz v. Bollinger case, Jennifer Gratz is accusing BAMN/Revolutionary Works League organizer Luke Massie with threatening her with a knife. Having failed in the courts, Gratz is currently heading an effort to ban affirmative action through a ballot initiative. Whether or not there’s any truth to the story, it underscores the tendancy of RWL members to engage in tense, direct personal confrontation. Luke’s tried the same intimidation tactics on me and some of my friends, and it’s yet another reason no mainstream political organization should work with him or his organization - physical intimidation and confrontation are not acceptable organizing tactics.
DetNews: “Police investigate alleged threat to affirmative action foe“
> My posts on Obama
Public Participation in Urban Planning Month
- Introduction
- Part 1: Urban Planning and E-Government
- Part 2: A Brief History of Public Participation in Urban Planning
- Part 3: Participation Theory
- Part 4: The Internet as a Participation Tool
- Conclusions
- Sidebars: Government as Data Source, Software for e-Government, more
My ULI Posts
What I'm Reading
Latest Entries
- Report Finds Public Participation Improves Policy
- What Neighborhoods Will Be The Next Hot Spots?
- Examining the Redlands Dam
- Tolls More Equitable Than Sales Tax For Funding Freeways
- Shared Vans Already Here … and Illegal
- Green Gas?
- The Economics of Redevelopment
- District Bike Sharing Launches
- Subprime Mortgages and Race
- The Equity of Housing Tax Benefits
Jun 15th, 2006 at 3:47 pm
“intimidation tactics”, I think you mean. …He pulled a knife on you or something? Just curious.
Jun 15th, 2006 at 4:36 pm
No, he just gets in your face.
Jun 22nd, 2006 at 11:06 am
I write to correct an error in your post. In your post of June 15, you wrote, “Having failed in the courts, Gratz is currently heading an effort to ban affirmative action through a ballot initiative.”
Ms. Gratz did not fail in the courts. She won her case. The United State Supreme Court held that the University of Michigan undergraduate admissions program discriminated against Ms. Gratz and thousands like her. Gratz v. Bollinger. 539 US 244 (2003). The Court ruled in Ms. Gratz’ favor 6-3. Not even close, really.
Jun 22nd, 2006 at 12:29 pm
While you’re correct the court ruled in Ms. Gratz favor and struck down the specific policy for undergraduates at the University of Michigan, in the companion case Grutter V. Bollinger, 539 U.S. 306 (2003) the court upheld the constitutionality of affirmative action.
This was my point: having failed to end affirmative action through the courts, Gratz, Connerly, and their supporters have turned to the ballot initiative.
Jun 24th, 2006 at 8:09 am
Perhaps one should look at Ms. Gratz’ efforts to end affirmative action in Michigan as accepting an invitation issued by the U.S. Supreme Court in the Grutter case. This is probably the most consciously ignored passage in that case:
“Universities in California, Florida, and Washington State, where racial preferences in admissions are prohibited by state law, are currently engaged in experimenting with a wide variety of alternative approaches. Universities in other States can and should draw on the most promising aspects of these race-neutral alternatives as they develop.”
Seems Ms. Gratz and company want Michigan to join the ranks of the experimenters.