Detroit Free Press architecture writer John Gallagher discusses in a column today
what should happen in Detroit to better preserve the city’s
architecture. He writes: “Preservation seems more like a secondary
option in Detroit, to be abandoned if a developer prefers tearing
something down and starting anew. That’s not making use of our best
assets,� and asks after pointing to a recent court battle over
preservation of a historic building, “Do we want to lurch from one of
these preservation crises to the next? Or do we want to take a lesson
from other cities that have found a way to make preservation pay?� The
column them summarizes four suggestions to increase the commitment to
preservation in the city: 1. Buy into the concept, 2. Dump the
stereotypes, 3. Define the Historic District Commission, 4. End
fragmentation of effort.
> Freep: “We can preserve Detroit“
(Image from DetroitYes!)
—–

> My posts on Obama
Public Participation in Urban Planning Month
- Introduction
- Part 1: Urban Planning and E-Government
- Part 2: A Brief History of Public Participation in Urban Planning
- Part 3: Participation Theory
- Part 4: The Internet as a Participation Tool
- Conclusions
- Sidebars: Government as Data Source, Software for e-Government, more
My ULI Posts
What I'm Reading
Latest Entries
- Report Finds Public Participation Improves Policy
- What Neighborhoods Will Be The Next Hot Spots?
- Examining the Redlands Dam
- Tolls More Equitable Than Sales Tax For Funding Freeways
- Shared Vans Already Here … and Illegal
- Green Gas?
- The Economics of Redevelopment
- District Bike Sharing Launches
- Subprime Mortgages and Race
- The Equity of Housing Tax Benefits
No Comments
Leave a Comment
trackback address