Posted: June 22nd, 2006 | Author: Rob Goodspeed | Filed under: College Park, Urban Development | 1 Comment »
The city of College Park has given preliminary approval to a $68-million, 17-story residential project planned for a site just north of campus on Route 1. I thought this was interesting:
“The university’s strategic plan calls for a higher quality college town,” said Brian Darmody, the university’s assistant vice president for research and economic development and member of the committee that approved the sector plan. “It creates a perception of what the university is like, and right now that’s not a very good perception. We are doing what we can, without owning the property, to enhance the gateway to the university.”
I’m working with some others to put together a development-oriented blog for College Park, please contact me if you’re interested in helping with our effort.
> U. Md. Diamondback: “City approves new condo project“
Posted: May 9th, 2006 | Author: Rob Goodspeed | Filed under: College Park, Government, Public Policy, Technology, Urban Development | 4 Comments »
Update, 10/24/06: Please visit the new blog Rethink College Park
College Park wants to be more “college town.” It turns out the home of the University of Maryland isn’t very college-town-y: it’s part auto-based sprawl, part dismal inner-ring suburb, and nothing like Tuscon, Ann Arbor, Madison, or any other of the country’s great college towns.
The remarkable thing is that beyond simply bemoaning this reality, students and local leaders alike seem to be trying to make some changes. The county has adopted form-based zoning, which can help encourage pedestrian development. The newly elected student government president even sponsored a design charrette to generate ideas about how they’d like to see the city grow, and city leaders have been cautiously receptive to the ideas.
The latest idea about how to foster change in the city comes this week in a thoughtful op-ed in the University of Maryland student paper, the Diamonback. In it, student David Daddio applauds the recent activity and the emerging concensus that the community wants a vibrant, walkable, college town. In the end, what is Daddio’s suggestion about what is needed to bring about this kind of College Park?
The time is now for the university to share resources with the city and strengthen communications with the county, which wields zoning authority. The student population living in College Park rivals the city’s resident population yet, as of now, we are only passive observers in these issues. We receive information piecemeal from the occasional newspaper article and there is little opportunity for public input.
This is why I propose the city and the university combine resources and form a user-friendly website — an ongoing public participation venue where students and city residents can be educated, debate the merits of projects and voice opinions. I can only hope the incoming Student Government Association takes these issues seriously, abandons previous notions that student participation in city issues is futile and fosters a commitment to creating a vision of a better College Park.
Ah, he thinks they need a website to help connect the campus community with city and county officials, and although he doesn’t say it, I imagine the development community as well. Between this blog, the student neighborhood association I started, the city task force I served on, and the community website I founded, I had quite a bit of experience in this area in Ann Arbor, a quintessential college town.
Although the general idea is a good one, I don’t think it should be directly administered by the city or county. In general, I’ve found websites administered by municipalities for development purposes reflect the bureaucratic nature of their owners and do not have the sufficient journalistic verve to attract and engage a broad audience. (DC government’s Inclusivecity.org is a good example, I think) The city or university could provide financial or material support, but in order really succeed I think any website must be independent enough to provide a neutral platform for all views.
What might be an ideal model? From an organizational size I think such an endeavor would be best implemented through an independent organization which could include Maryland students, faculty, College Park community members, and perhaps even county leaders and developers. Although the site could receive support in the form of operating grants from the city or university it should retain the strict editorial independence and dedication to free discussion of any journalistic exercise. The University of Maryland’s own College of Journalism administers through their J-Lab (their website is down currently) division small grants for exactly this type of project: innovative applications to technology in local journalism.
Once we have the organizational underpinnings in place there is of course the all-important question of technology. As I see it there are only two viable options:
- A Blog: This site would be anchored by a blog covering the latest news with static pages containing a library of information. Discussion would take place mostly in commenting, and perhaps through listservs designed to drive traffic back to the site. The advantage of this site is that it would be the best way to build a broad audience and inform people, the downside is that it is difficult to use to hold deliberative conversations.
- A Forum: If administered well, forums can work to foster inclusive, high-level discussions, but can be difficult to use to engage the majority of community members. I was very impressed by a presentation I saw by the people at the organization e-democracy.org who have lots of experience building high quality civic discussion forums, and even have paid to design some custom software to do it.
Ideally the magic-bullet solution would be a seamless hybrid of both, although if one exists I’m not aware of it. I’ll be interested to see if anything develops from his idea, and if it does would certainly consider helping.
Diamondback articles:
> David Daddio Op-ed, 5/8: “Rethinking College Park”
> 5/3: “City receptive to student designs”
> 4/10: “SGA holds event to plan ‘college town’”
> 3/31: “Students suggest theater, shopping for city at forum“
Posted: April 28th, 2006 | Author: Rob Goodspeed | Filed under: College Park | No Comments »
As a newly accepted University of Maryland graduate student, was all set to attend their 8th annual “Maryland Day” event planned for tomorrow. Unfortunately, some last minute work travel popped up so I won’t be able to go. This year the annual end-of-year event is doubling as a 150th anniversary, and they have all kinds of wacky events lined up including the “World’s Largest” Strawberry Shortcake and unveiling of a bunch of decorated Testudos that will be displayed in the region. I think the university’s transportation department has some of the most entertaining stuff planned:
… A thrill of a different kind can be found at the bus-pulling contest, located next to the obstacle course. Here, teams of five to eight people will compete by tugging a shuttle bus towards the finish line, which would take one to two minutes to reach, depending on the strength of the team. Teams will pull the buses next to each other.
Watch these same teams compete in Bus-ketball. As team buses circles in a pre-determined route, the team will shoot playground balls toward the “basket” for points. There are just a couple rules, however. Players have to be seated and cannot lean out of the window.
Daihatsu Stuffing Contest
Finally, these teams will compete in a Daihatsu stuffing contest, featuring some of the smallest vehicles on campus. Teams will attempt to stuff as many people in the shortest period of time into a maintenance vehicle designed to fit only one to two people. …
Posted: March 28th, 2006 | Author: Rob Goodspeed | Filed under: College Park | 1 Comment »
So, the second piece of correspondence coming my direction from the College Park area behind the admissions letter notifying my acceptance to grad school was a letter from the “Graduate Hils & Graduate Gardens Apartment Homes” at 3424 Tulane Drive in nearby Hyattsville, Maryland. The letter congratulated me on my admissions to the university urging me to submit an application and “$100 holding charge to obtain a position on the waitlist” for a shot at living in Maryland’s “only graduate housing community.” The letter also contained a copy of a letter they apparently received from University of Maryland Assistant Dean John M. Mollish providing them with my name and address and urging them to assist me to “move expeditiously through your application process for off-campus housing.”
I’m not sure where to start with this one. First, are the names of students at public universities public? Second, if they are, are their home addresses? And third, if those are as well, why does the university choose to send private companies my name with such panache? Perhaps they think they’re doing out-of-town students a favor. The irony in all this is that I’ve been riding the bus past the rather banal apartment complex for months now on the R3 to the National Archives’ College Park facility.