<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: What Government Data Should be Transparent?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://goodspeedupdate.com/2010/2976/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://goodspeedupdate.com/2010/2976</link>
	<description>Rob Goodspeed&#039;s blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Apr 2012 13:48:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff Stanger</title>
		<link>http://goodspeedupdate.com/2010/2976/comment-page-1#comment-566201</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff Stanger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jun 2010 14:06:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodspeedupdate.com/?p=2976#comment-566201</guid>
		<description>Great post.  I&#039;m not a transparency advocate, I&#039;m concerned more with informative ability.  Maybe transparency is a byproduct of good information, not raw data distribution?  Here is a comment I submitted over at thescoop to a post that references yours.  Perhaps should have posted it here first:

I think what people are realizing is that there is a difference between data and information. I recently created the Center for Digital Information http://digitalinfo.org  not focused just on government research/data, but policy research generally including think tanks, agencies, foundations, nonprofits, etc. The goal is to start to make these important distinctions between “research” “data” “information” where they are often used synonymously. To qualify as “information,” I maintain it needs to be effectively *communicated* (in digital media). Perhaps that’s where data distribution such as this falls short of information?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great post.  I&#8217;m not a transparency advocate, I&#8217;m concerned more with informative ability.  Maybe transparency is a byproduct of good information, not raw data distribution?  Here is a comment I submitted over at thescoop to a post that references yours.  Perhaps should have posted it here first:</p>
<p>I think what people are realizing is that there is a difference between data and information. I recently created the Center for Digital Information <a href="http://digitalinfo.org" rel="nofollow">http://digitalinfo.org</a>  not focused just on government research/data, but policy research generally including think tanks, agencies, foundations, nonprofits, etc. The goal is to start to make these important distinctions between “research” “data” “information” where they are often used synonymously. To qualify as “information,” I maintain it needs to be effectively *communicated* (in digital media). Perhaps that’s where data distribution such as this falls short of information?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob Goodspeed</title>
		<link>http://goodspeedupdate.com/2010/2976/comment-page-1#comment-560853</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob Goodspeed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 May 2010 18:41:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodspeedupdate.com/?p=2976#comment-560853</guid>
		<description>Adrian, thanks for the comment. Your comment makes me think the role could be data as part of the traditional role for public media, similar to some of the stuff in the Knight Commission&#039;s report on &quot;information needs in a democracy.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Adrian, thanks for the comment. Your comment makes me think the role could be data as part of the traditional role for public media, similar to some of the stuff in the Knight Commission&#8217;s report on &#8220;information needs in a democracy.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adrian Holovaty</title>
		<link>http://goodspeedupdate.com/2010/2976/comment-page-1#comment-560746</link>
		<dc:creator>Adrian Holovaty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 May 2010 01:27:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodspeedupdate.com/?p=2976#comment-560746</guid>
		<description>Great list, Rob.

I&#039;d propose a sixth: &quot;Data to Keep Citizens Informed,&quot; which would include crime, health inspections, new business licenses and the types of frequently updated, &quot;newsy&quot; government information we collect at EveryBlock. I realize your list is slightly skewed toward incentives for *governments* to release their data, but I&#039;d argue an informed public helps the government do its job better (e.g., in community policing).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great list, Rob.</p>
<p>I&#8217;d propose a sixth: &#8220;Data to Keep Citizens Informed,&#8221; which would include crime, health inspections, new business licenses and the types of frequently updated, &#8220;newsy&#8221; government information we collect at EveryBlock. I realize your list is slightly skewed toward incentives for *governments* to release their data, but I&#8217;d argue an informed public helps the government do its job better (e.g., in community policing).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

