<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: &#8216;The Kos Approach&#8217;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://goodspeedupdate.com/2006/1908/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://goodspeedupdate.com/2006/1908</link>
	<description>Rob Goodspeed&#039;s blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 09 Jan 2012 16:37:16 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: S. S. Trudeau &#187; Blog Archive &#187; The Kos Approach</title>
		<link>http://goodspeedupdate.com/2006/1908/comment-page-1#comment-6046</link>
		<dc:creator>S. S. Trudeau &#187; Blog Archive &#187; The Kos Approach</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 May 2006 15:06:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodspeedupdate.com/?p=1908#comment-6046</guid>
		<description></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Rob posted this recently and it merits more attention. Verbatim: University of Maryland professor Peter Levine has some interesting things to say about the liberal blogosphere in response to bloggers Jerome Armstrong and Markos Moulitsas Zúniga’s new book, Crashing the Gate: Netroots, Grassroots, and the Rise of People-Powered Politics:  I should also note that 2006 is the perfect year for the Kos approach. The main issue really will be incompetence and corruption in one-party Washington, and people (some people) really will vote Democratic simply in order to check and oversee the Republicans. This is one year when it may work simply to attack the incumbent party and promote an alternative set of players. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Martin</title>
		<link>http://goodspeedupdate.com/2006/1908/comment-page-1#comment-5888</link>
		<dc:creator>Martin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Apr 2006 23:13:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodspeedupdate.com/?p=1908#comment-5888</guid>
		<description>I think the problem is that people are confusing &quot;Democrat&quot; with &quot;liberal.&quot; Now, even the successes of Howard Dean and Kos, they are hardly the same thing.

The other problem is that the Democrats aren&#039;t hitting hard on the issue that resonates with all Americans--health care and economics. People might not give a rat fuck about Iraq, gay marriage, or anything else, but they care about increasing gas costs. They care about stagnant wages. They care about ballooning health care costs. They care about the lack of resources for retirement.

I think what we need is a third party movement that successfully fuses economic conservatism (low taxes, cutting deficit spending, eliminating government waste, encouraging investment) with social liberalism (abortion and civil rights protections, a free press, comprehensive education for all children, environmental safeguards).

Even the most conservative RWNM lover wants a good life for his family and his kids. The trick is to make them see that they&#039;re getting fucked by the Bush regime as much as any liberal--maybe more, because we never drank the Kool-Aid. ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the problem is that people are confusing &#8220;Democrat&#8221; with &#8220;liberal.&#8221; Now, even the successes of Howard Dean and Kos, they are hardly the same thing.</p>
<p>The other problem is that the Democrats aren&#8217;t hitting hard on the issue that resonates with all Americans&#8211;health care and economics. People might not give a rat fuck about Iraq, gay marriage, or anything else, but they care about increasing gas costs. They care about stagnant wages. They care about ballooning health care costs. They care about the lack of resources for retirement.</p>
<p>I think what we need is a third party movement that successfully fuses economic conservatism (low taxes, cutting deficit spending, eliminating government waste, encouraging investment) with social liberalism (abortion and civil rights protections, a free press, comprehensive education for all children, environmental safeguards).</p>
<p>Even the most conservative RWNM lover wants a good life for his family and his kids. The trick is to make them see that they&#8217;re getting fucked by the Bush regime as much as any liberal&#8211;maybe more, because we never drank the Kool-Aid. ;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JCP2</title>
		<link>http://goodspeedupdate.com/2006/1908/comment-page-1#comment-5836</link>
		<dc:creator>JCP2</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Apr 2006 18:07:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodspeedupdate.com/?p=1908#comment-5836</guid>
		<description>As the birth rate for liberals is substantially lower than that of conservatives (especially social conservatives), I expect that demographics will tilt the balance substantiallt to the right in a few years.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As the birth rate for liberals is substantially lower than that of conservatives (especially social conservatives), I expect that demographics will tilt the balance substantiallt to the right in a few years.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Boyle</title>
		<link>http://goodspeedupdate.com/2006/1908/comment-page-1#comment-5811</link>
		<dc:creator>David Boyle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Apr 2006 16:36:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodspeedupdate.com/?p=1908#comment-5811</guid>
		<description></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;There’s plenty of folks here in DC who believe that shift is due either to the Right Wing Noise Machine or the Conservative Infrastructure, pouring their energy into new, liberal, think tanks, PACs, leadership programs.&#8221;&#8230;you mean new, conservative think tanks, I assume?? (heh)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

